Quote:
Originally Posted by zebra16
![View Post]()
Yes one should join hand with organisations like IPP and try to preserve the heritage.
But the comment about "lamenting on some unknown culture or life style" is unwarranted. It needs just a little reflection to realise that the temple and artefacts would not have come into existence but for the **culture**
But the comment about "lamenting on some unknown culture or life style" is unwarranted. It needs just a little reflection to realise that the temple and artefacts would not have come into existence but for the **culture**
You have stripped the adjective "unknown" from the word Culture and changed the meaning of the message. No one is opposed to all culture. But we as human being living in a civil societies have to change some part of culture as the times goes on.
Define what aspect of and who's culture you want to preserve and we may or may not agree.
If defecating in public is the culture, I am against it.
If practicing Child marriage is the culture, I am against it.
If eating vegetarian food is the culture I am for it.
I speaking the truth is the culture I am for it.
I am not for preserving the "entire 14th century culture" in 21st century. Please do not parse the sentence.